Comment on High court claimant was fed answers through his smart glasses, judge finds

Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• RobotToaster@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  In conclusion she rejected Jakštys’s evidence “in its entirety” and found for the defendants.

  Given this was a high court case, that will not be cheap.

  source

  • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Sure, but losing a case isn’t a punishment for wrongdoing during the hearings.

    A real punishment would have been getting detained and having to pay a large fine

    source

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Since he obeyed the judge’s orders it may have been difficult to prove contempt.

      Courts also seem to take the view that a right to a fair trial includes the right to fuck up your own trial.

      I imagine the solicitor coaching him via the glasses will be getting a lengthy complaint to the SRA, which could see him struck off.

      source

      • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Fingers crossed, shitty behaviour

        source