Depends on the country, but typically 65-67 and if you take it earier it also comes with a significant reduction. So all in all it seems pretty comparable.

Of course people here also complain about this as insufficient, but the reality is that even this amount is not sustainable due to demographic changes and people living significantly longer.

I think there needs to be some sort of radical rethinking on how we sustain an elderly population. The existing systems that are based on bygone demografic assumptions clearly can’t work any longer.