Comment on An actually functional webproxy to self-host
moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 1 day agoThese kinds of setups are used to bypass agressive network filtering and content censhorship. All the traffic is http(s). And then the way only a browser is needed means it works on locked down devices like chromebooks.
The browser in docker is something I have used, but it requires more resources to host and can only be used by one person at once if you are using something like linuxserver’s webtop.
wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Then EOCKS is what you want. It can be used on a Chromebook as well.
These proxying websites are running full browser instances in the background. It’s the only way to guarantee all the traffic is routed through it.
moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 1 day ago
No, Socks5 does not work for this usecase. You don’t get permissions to run it locally via crostini and the settings are locked in the chromebook settings. In addition to this, it is too easy to fingerprint, and some of the more aggressive setups will catch it and block it. For example, my high school would autodetect wireguard and then kick you off of the network for 10 minutes if you attempted to connect.