Comment on An actually functional webproxy to self-host
wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
What exactly do you mean by web proxy? Something like Invidious? An http proxy? A SOCKS5 proxy?
Comment on An actually functional webproxy to self-host
wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
What exactly do you mean by web proxy? Something like Invidious? An http proxy? A SOCKS5 proxy?
myszka@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Close to invidious but not specific to any particular site. A page that allows to open other pages through it, like a browser inside a web page except it’s only for opening a website and has no other browser functionality. Here’s a proprietary example: croxyproxy.com
wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Yeah what you want is a SOCKS5 proxy.
myszka@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Thanks! SOCKS5 proxy is a good option, I don’t know why I didn’t think of it from the very beginning…
My goal is to bypass local censorship on university computers that don’t allow running any executables except those provided by the administrator. And I’m trying to help professors who aren’t particularly tech-savvy, so a webproxy is actually still a better option.
moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
By the way: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_IT
moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
These kinds of setups are used to bypass agressive network filtering and content censhorship. All the traffic is http(s). And then the way only a browser is needed means it works on locked down devices like chromebooks.
The browser in docker is something I have used, but it requires more resources to host and can only be used by one person at once if you are using something like linuxserver’s webtop.
wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Then EOCKS is what you want. It can be used on a Chromebook as well.
These proxying websites are running full browser instances in the background. It’s the only way to guarantee all the traffic is routed through it.