Comment on After outages, Amazon to make senior engineers sign off on AI-assisted changes
pedroapero@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
Yes, so now when there’s a success, it gets attributed to AI. When there’s an outage, that’s the fault of humans not reviewing correctly. Employees get fucked either ways.
IratePirate@feddit.org 5 days ago
Precisely. From Cory Doctorow’s latest, very insightful essay on AI, where he talks about AI replacing 9 out of 10 radiologists:
kimara@sopuli.xyz 5 days ago
I don’t think it’s fair to compare LLM code generation to machine vision in this way. These very different "AI"s. Not necessarily disagreeing with Doctorow, but this is an important distinction.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 5 days ago
How the machines work does not matter. The situation is using a machine to replace human expertise while ensuring a human still takes responsibility for things that human is not responsible for. It is not the owning class who is at risk for their machines mistakes, it is the owning classes wage slaves who are at risk.
kimara@sopuli.xyz 5 days ago
My understanding is that the tumor detecting machine vision is generally thought useful in addition to the radiologist’s expertise. It basically outputs “yes”, “maybe”, and “no”, which is more expertise respecting than generating somewhere thereabouts code, which the coder has to (now) validate.
This is why I wouldn’t equate these tools. LLM code generation is marketed to do much more than machine vision for tumor detection.
Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
The kind of AI doesn’t matter with this situation. Hell, It could be a magic talking rock™ and it change nothing of Mismanagement using a person to avoid blaming their shiny and expensive new toy.
Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 5 days ago
“this is an important distinction”
it really isn’t