Well, sometimes gender fucks with the data because we live in a society and all that. Gotta at least try to compensate for likely sources of error
It’s frustrating. It’s 2026 and we’re still pointlessly gendering things. And I don’t mean this is a “omg you assumed my gender” way. I mean that organization’s that should know better go the extra mile to apply strict genders to things and processes. If this email is about workplace harassment or something like that, it would be easier to just not gender people.
Ratio_Tile@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Soup@lemmy.world 1 day ago
But they’re very correct that so many things aren’t needed. I mean, gender on a driver license? Really?
_skj@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The email sounds like a college student participating in a sociology study for class and asking the professor for clarification. This is exactly the kind of thing that I’d expect to ask about gender along with a bunch of other personal information. The goal being to see if any patterns in the responses.
Sociology in general does have the problem that categories are important and helpful to spotting patterns, but people are very difficult to categorize. People just don’t fit cleanly into categories