Comment on Introducing New Fediverse Software, Goofed v0.0.1, Minimum Viable Shitpost Edition
admin@scrapetacular.ydns.eu 3 days agoShit, that went well, I was expecting pushback. Should I make an issue for discussion, or is there one already. I don’t know if the object also needs an ID
rimu@piefed.social 3 days ago
There is a discussion but it’s an email chain between myself, Lemmy, Mbin, NodeBB so not really out in the open.
I’m thinking of using the normal OrderedCollection structure that AP has - https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-orderedcollection. An object of type ’OrderedCollection’ with an array of ‘items’.
admin@scrapetacular.ydns.eu 3 days ago
I think so? I guess a Like has to happen before an Unlike, would the collection have multiple possible activity types in it?
While I have your ear, I don’t know how yet but I’d like it to be easier for devs to collaborate over AP for anything not involving security.
rimu@piefed.social 2 days ago
Yes theoretically you could have any type in there but votes are the biggest inefficiency in the system so I’ve only implemented it for them.
There are some nodebb forums that federate with us, which are intended for AP dev discussions - !technical-discussion@activitypub.space for example. Not very active. Also some Matrix channels, again not exactly humming. Everyone is pretty focused on their own projects, really.
admin@scrapetacular.ydns.eu 2 days ago
Thanks, subscribed to activitypub.space. I’ll probably make a post about the guest posting trial in the General Discussion channel at some point, since people are talking about barriers to first use.