Oh interesting, may I ask how specialized those sources were? The first scenario that comes to mind is that perhaps they were known to be less than reputable, which could lead to a ban
Oh interesting, may I ask how specialized those sources were? The first scenario that comes to mind is that perhaps they were known to be less than reputable, which could lead to a ban
melroy@kbin.melroy.org 1 day ago
Somebody else was agreeing with me, so didn't agree with the moderator either. But the moderator thought that this was an alt account of mine (which it wasn't, it was not me). And then it banned it from the platform. My account a 15 years account old. You can look it up, it's under my real full name.
But ow well. I don't mind anymore like I said. I hope there will be more Wikipedia alternatives.
Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Oh wow, yeah that sounds like some crazy mod abuse. Nothing beats volunteer contributors when it comes to drama haha
melroy@kbin.melroy.org 13 hours ago
Wikipedia is getting the same faith as stackoverflow now.
I'm actually more in favor of more specialized wikis instead today. Like arch Linux wiki. Which I also contribute to. Or wine wiki etc.