Also I can't really answer the question if it's bad or not what happens to ntfy.sh since it really depends on how the maintainer is using Ai here. Whether he did test the code, and read all the generated code.
Ai in itself isn't the problem here.
Comment on New ntfy.sh v2.18.0 was written by AI
porcoesphino@mander.xyz 1 day agoWas this written with genAI? Even the TLDR is padded fluff of common talking points
melroy@kbin.melroy.org 19 hours ago
melroy@kbin.melroy.org 20 hours ago
Haha. I'm not a native English speaker.
NannerBanner@literature.cafe 1 day ago
I’m halfway with you, and halfway just considering that people think it’s relevant to include a tl;dr in a barely three paragraph comment. The feeling with tl;dr for me is a summary similar to a closing paragraph, and if anyone thinks that one sentence (“Ai coding can help a lot in accelerating software development.”) is somehow worthy of being summarized as if the point was proven (“Ai can be very powerful in the right hands”)… well, it sounds like shit because it is shit. Maybe it’s ai, maybe it’s just a really rushed dude making a throwaway comment in the fediverse, and maybe it’s just a person who is confident enough in their mind that they forget they haven’t made an actually decent argument outside of their past, and concluding as if they brought that past argument forth here is eye-raising.
Considering he’s on his own instance… I’m going to bet the context is somewhere between throwaway comment and invoking past assertions without citing them.
melroy@kbin.melroy.org 20 hours ago
You can run my text through Ai checkers if you wish. But it's not Ai generated.
I'm not just on my own instance. I'm the creator of the software: Mbin. Previously known as kbin.