Comment on Just one more square bro
definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 4 days agoThe downvotes are, I assume, from the *WHOOSH* sound as the point flies over your head.
This is the optional packing of 17 squares in a minimum-size larger square. Of course it’s not optional everywhere. It’s specific to 17 squares packed in a square.
The joke is that there’s no reason to choose 17 squares as, clearly, a rectangular* array is optimal.
*squares are, of course, rectangles.