Hey dipshit. Im still curious about your opinion of verbally abused children and how they are under no distress whatsover
Comment on Father sues Google, claiming Gemini chatbot drove son into fatal delusion
kikutwo@lemmy.world 1 week agoYou would, but the shrink wasn’t remarking in physical but mental impacts just like chatgpt.
Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 week ago
kikutwo@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You are in control of how you react, not the abuser. Just like your shitty attitude, that was your choice because you are a pseudo intellectualist.
Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 week ago
So you really are saying abused children need to just suck it up?
kikutwo@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Key Perspectives on this Statement: Pro-Assertion (Empowerment): This view, often shared by therapists like Nicole Symcox and Karen Koenig, argues that our feelings stem from our own interpretations of events, not the events themselves. It is designed to stop people from feeling like victims of others’ actions. Con-Assertion (Contextual): Critics, such as Therapist Jeff, argue that this phrase is “wrong, mostly” because it ignores the human need for connection and the reality that actions (especially abuse or trauma) can cause immediate, involuntary, and valid emotional pain. The Nuance: The statement is most effective when interpreted as: “You can control your reaction to what people do,” rather than, “You shouldn’t feel hurt by what people do”. Reddit Reddit +4 If this advice makes your wife feel dismissed, it might be an example of accidental emotional invalidation, which can cause confusion and self-doubt. The goal should be to acknowledge feelings while also developing skills to not let others’ behavior dictate one’s entire emotional state. Reddit Reddit +3
kikutwo@lemmy.world 1 week ago
My wife was about fifty at the time she was seeing this PhD not talking about children.
Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 week ago
So verbally abused children need to just suck it up because their parents can’t make them feel anything?