Comment on U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear dispute over copyrights for AI-generated material
dan@upvote.au 1 day agoWhat if the drafts were created using AI too?
Code is often in a source control system of some sort, which tracks changes to the code (who changed it and when it was changed). I don’t think that could prove that a human wrote it, though.
I think in cases like this, the author could prove they created the code/story/art/whatever by having a deep understanding of the material. That’s how Michael Jackson defended against lawsuits saying he copied someone else’s song - he described his songwriting process and could hum/beatbox every instrument in the track.
ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
How you gonna fake years worth of hand written notes and dated drafts?
tabular@lemmy.world 1 day ago
If the training data for “drafts” and “hand written notes” exists then one can train an AI on it, and generate it the same way. Do some artists share such things?
ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Idk what you’re talking about. How’s an AI going to train on my handwritten notes?
tabular@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m not an artist, I just write silly game systems. I took for granted that a handwritting machine was an easy assumption. I doubt AI companies even have the insentive to try and create physical handwriting/sketching but I see no reason to believe it’s impossible.
Here appears to be a handwriting printer “holding” a pen. People can probably tell this was not human written but I just imagine a machine that can replicate human hand motion better - like a robot hand on a robot arm.