Comment on People who reject challenging ideas as stupid without engagement are like intellectual nepobabies

• Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Alright, well I’m happy to engage with that. I know it’s not a realist’s cage because I’m actively maintaining My subjective world and making choices about what to believe on a daily and weekly and yearly basis. I’m being an active agent in a way that realists don’t. They let society tell them what is objectively true. I don’t care about that, I’m asking Myself what is useful to believe.

  source

  • SenK@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    How do you define what a realist cage is without being informed by objective reality?

    source

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Subjectively.

      source

      • SenK@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        If you define this subjectively, from where comes the wording “we must” and “we need to” in your earlier messages?

        Your words: “we must destroy consensus reality” “We need to kill the idea of objective reality”

        In your world of free, subjective experience first, are people not allowed to form consensus that disagrees with your subjective ideals?

        source

        • -> View More Comments