None of what you’ve said is n this thread makes any logical sense…
Which would be fine cuz it’s about ghosts, but you keep acting like physics backs up your wild statements and made up vocabulary…
Comment on Can a reasonable person genuinely believe in ghosts?
EvilBit@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoI mean there’s no way to go from immeasurable to measurable except in scale, and anywhere north of quantum scale, physics has been reliably predictable and measurable. Ghosts’ purported impact is on a scale well above that which is unexplained.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
What vocabulary did they make up?
EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I’m not making shit up as I go. If you don’t understand something, it isn’t consequently nonsensical.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
What exactly do you mean when you keep saying “physical forces”?
The phrase doesn’t appear once in your link. Or anywhere else in reference to physics…
You 100% made that up, and at this point I don’t really care why
EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
So you’re hung up on the phrasing “physical forces” not appearing in a textbook?
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Why do you say ghosts’ purported impact is on a scale above that which is unexplained?
Quantum fields impact the universe on a scale above their own. It’s entirely possible that the explanation for ghosts is on the quantum scale or smaller, and the observable effects are just that: effects of a much subtler phenomenon.
EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Yes, quantum scale has macro effect, but the macro scale is predictable and rigidly causal, negating any meaningful quantum scale interactional impact. A macro causation effected via quantum interactions is a de facto macro interaction.