Comment on UK fines Reddit $19 million for using children’s data unlawfully
blackn1ght@feddit.uk 3 weeks agoI’m not defending the guy but wasn’t it that a mod of that subreddit added him as a mod as a joke? I don’t think spez created it.
Comment on UK fines Reddit $19 million for using children’s data unlawfully
blackn1ght@feddit.uk 3 weeks agoI’m not defending the guy but wasn’t it that a mod of that subreddit added him as a mod as a joke? I don’t think spez created it.
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
I believe op unless you have proof.
blackn1ght@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
It was always the version of events that I’ve read.
I just did a quick search and found this, a video claiming that he was a mod, but the majority of comments indicate it’s not true and that it was debunked.
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Spez actually owns site where majority of comments stick up for said owner? Sorry man, that ain’t proof. Wtf are you sticking up for spez anyway? I don’t know anyone sane that would.
blackn1ght@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Well where’s the proof that he created it? I’ll happily stand corrected.
I just think that if we’re going to attack someone, it’s probably a good idea to use facts that are true and not made up (it’s likely that op just misremembered the details) otherwise it just puts doubt on any further valid points. I’ve no interest in defending the guy but I do think we should try and keep our facts straight when we criticise him.
mmmac@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
The burden of proof is on the accusor