Comment

Comment on Ladybird Browser adopts Rust, with help from AI

TheOneCurly@feddit.online ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

Yeah seems about right for this project. I really wanted this to be a serious browser, but nothing about this dude is serious.

Also I know he backed this statement up with much better testing but these AI brainrot things people say kill me: “I ran multiple passes of adversarial review, asking different models to analyze the code for mistakes and bad patterns.”

source

Sort:hotnew top

XLE@piefed.social ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
“I coded this with hundreds of handcrafted AI prompts.”

“That sounds hazardous, but did you test it?”

“I had multiple AIs test it it!”

source
- lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Let us all hope Servo does not go down the same path.
  
  source
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
It is one thing to use coding agents to produce code. It is another to trust it on reviewing it.

This reminds me of the C compiler written by Claude Code, which was compiling everything, except printf(“Hello from CCC!\n”);

source
thenose@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
You’re not the first I hear saying his bad news/not serious. Afaik I didn’t hear a thing about him until ladybird. What did I missed?

source
- brianpeiris@lemmy.ca ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  hyperborea.org/reviews/…/ladybird-inclusivity/
  mastodon.social/@alatiera/115272605624599561
  
  source
  - fdnomad@programming.dev ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    God that screenshot is giving me severe second hand embarrassment
    
    source
  - BryyM@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Those were some disappointing reads
    
    source