Comment on How I got robbed of my first kernel contribution
SWW13@lemmy.brief.guru 9 months agoGood point, this could just misrepresentat the situation. I also haven’t looked over the mailing list thread and comments here are very salty.
But giving him the benefit of doubt of a nice potential contributer who just debugged a very hard issue and sending in a basic concept of a potential fix. I think it would be beneficial for their community to take the wish for more credit more serious and try to make him feel welcome. But I recognize it was probably hard to do in this case.
Overall I just wanted to recognize that I do see how he feels robbed of his contribution. It reminded me that I also had an experience with the kernel developers that made me not want to contribute again.
lysdexic@programming.dev 9 months ago
I think they did. Apparently the maintainer trusted the first-time contributor enough to propose tackling another bug. If the goal is to get more contributions, I think that’s exactly what should happen. Whining about getting extra work feels like the author didn’t intended to contribute anything else and just put all this reputation chips on that one isolated ticket.
aloso@programming.dev 9 months ago
There is no trust needed when asking someone to fix a bug. It’s not like the maintainer would lose anything if the contributor failed to fix the bug.
Besides, I think it is natural to want recognition when you do a lot of work for free. Many other people wouldn’t do this unpaid work at all; recognizing their contribution is the bare minimum of good manners. Even in a company where employees are paid for their work, it is customary to give credit to people who have helped you. Most people don’t like to work in places where they don’t feel appreciated, and that is also true in Open-Source.