Comment on Judge scolds Mark Zuckerberg's team for wearing Meta glasses to social media trial
chasteinsect@programming.dev 3 weeks agoMaybe just maybe it’s because it’s not as black or white as you make it seem? Especially talking about a company that did so much for Linux and looking at what their competition is doing…
yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
So it’s ok for you to have 10 years old developing a gambling habit and potentially ruining their live, because hey they are pushing Linux in gaming?
0x0@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Did valve create the gambling games you mention?
yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Yes.
0x0@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
I’m curious as to which ones you’re talking about.
KingOfSuede@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Sounds to me like a parenting issue, not a valve issue.
yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
The only parental failure I’m seeing here is you. You do not deserve to take part into an adult discussion.
Smaile@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Lol get this clown outta here.
chasteinsect@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
I feel like you’re straw-manning here.
I never said it’s okay. All I’m saying is that a mega-corporation can simultaneously exploit psychological loopholes for profit (loot boxes) while actively pushing open-source ecosystems (Linux), providing great value to consumers and fighting other pc gaming monopolies (Microsoft). Look at the whole picture.
yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Is it ok to ruin a kid’s life because you are pushing Linux in gaming, yes or no?
chasteinsect@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
It’s not.
Look, you are not necessarily wrong, in holding the opinion that Valve’s monetization practices are so horrible, that they ruin the company’s entire reputation. It’s a valid moral boundary. But at the end of the day, it’s just an opinion, not some objective law of the universe and other people can weigh the scales differently without being an evil person. Yet you portray it as the TRUTH. And it’s a bit ironic, that when people disagreed you started talking about echo chambers and attacking the community. This is why you got downvoted.
sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
So you’re saying that since a company is reprehensible in one area, all their other accomplishments should be judged accordingly?
Makes sense to me.