Here we go again with the conspiracy bullshit
Comment on systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
If you shoot the competitors and reject questions and dissent, then you win. Good job, IBM !
flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
badgermurphy@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Its not, though. The chain of events is well documented, with much of the original correspondence still there to read and evaluate for yourself. Its arguably not a conspiracy, either, since it was perpetrated by a single entity.
Their motivations for doing it are the subject of a lot of speculation, some of it pretty wild, but the facts that they did do it and how it was done are public record.
flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 17 hours ago
So red hat somehow “shot the competition” (Microsoft?) but also is willfully running Linux by deciding to adopt systemd in order to replace the steaming pile of horseshit that is sysvinit. A move that was extremely successful and led to a much more robust base for today’s Linux systems in retrospect.
Or was it lennard poettering (who has a second job as the antichrist) who “shot the competition” by jumping in bed with red hat and/or IBM leadership to make them not consider other init systems. (Also to ruin Linux or something despite, and I repeat myself here, the move to systemd being a great success in retrospect)
Is it perfect? No, TeX is the only software that is. Is it better that we just went with one init system for most distros to leave the dark ages of sysvinit as fast as possible? 100%.
badgermurphy@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Bro I’m not making a single claim about the merits or flaws of systemd. I’m talking about the huge infighting and strong arming that went on back when it came out. I had an LTS server back then and just had my popcorn out to watch, since I don’t have the programming expertise to weigh the pros and cons of init systems at a philosophical level.
lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 2 days ago
Didn’t expect this topic to still be that controversial… Maybe I’m too young to know, but how was IBM involved?
Paradox@lemdro.id 2 days ago
Ibm owns red hat