this violates the 2nd amendment
Comment on California’s New Bill Requires DOJ-Approved 3D Printers That Report on Themselves
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Someone more eloquent than I am needs to craft a compelling argument that this violates the 2nd amendment.
elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
It also violates the first and fourth. And it does nothing about gun violence.
It’s also impossible to actually implement and is no more than one more privacy violation to add to the pile.
filcuk@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Any proper printer should work offline.
Any normal printer doesn’t have nearly enough processing power to run analysis on bgcode/instruction files (it’s nor needed for normal operation).
Good luck idiot lawmakers
CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Knowing the internet, I also assume that a custom firmware or some other workaround would be released in about a week anyway, making the whole thing utterly pointless.
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
This is what I’m talking about. We are stating to get to a cojent argument that I can call my representatives with and bitch them out, politely.
Am a Californian by choice.