If the argument doesn’t land, happy to talk about that. The style I can adjust.
lmfao gtfo
My daughter in family chat said the same thing this last week. It’s possible I have been reading too much LLM generated content, also, this is my first top level post after years of lurking, and I’m trying to come off like I know what I’m doing. If the argument doesn’t land, happy to talk about that. The style I can adjust.
If the argument doesn’t land, happy to talk about that. The style I can adjust.
lmfao gtfo
It’s not even the style on its own*; it’s that you wrote a frankly bloviating short essay about an obvious concept that can be summarized as “most people who watch the weather don’t know what a public key is or how to use one”. I’m disgustingly long-winded, and even I wouldn’t expend that much effort. The style is what escalates that from “padding a high school essay” to “Oh, yup, a GPT wrote this.”
* “It’s not X, it’s Y” yeah, yeah, I know.
That’s fair. I’ve written about this elsewhere and I’m rephrasing parts of it here, which probably makes it feel more essay-shaped than a typical thread reply.
I wasn’t trying to pad anything. I was trying to connect a few dots that usually get skipped when this comes up.
merde@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
please don’t.
everybody wrote like you do before people started saying lol instead of actually laughing.
UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au 1 day ago
Right? LLMs are trained on the work of humans. LLMs are not long-winded and wordy due to some quirk of their training. Writing and language are always changing but modern writing is generally concise and simplistic to a fault compared to historical English.