Comment on To image cache or not to image cache

bdonvr@thelemmy.club ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• ssnoer@indie-ver.se ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I mean, 1.2TB isn’t that much in terms of price, but it’s still a heck of a lot. I’m gonna look into proxying, and disabling the caching. Thanks!

  source

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    1.2 TB is a shitload

    That’s about 1/8 my current total storage - in today’s drive costs that’s about $40 for just primary storage, and then 2x - 3x that for backup storage.

    source

    • mudkip@lemdro.id ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      1.2 tb is not that much even on the cloud

      source
    • ssnoer@indie-ver.se ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I just set up our S3 image storage, which costs us 6.27€ pr. TB. (with Hetzner)

      Actually, how do you backup your images? I am bit unsure of what to do here, since the objects aren’t really managed by me.

      source

      • mapto@feddit.bg ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        From how you describe your context (similar to mine), you don’t seem to need to backup images. Few local images mean little impact of possible failures.

        source
  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    On S3 storage it’s a monthly cost

    source