Comment on Why are people disconnecting or destroying their Ring cameras?
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 hours agoCan’t you get a surveillance camera from anywhere and use that?
Comment on Why are people disconnecting or destroying their Ring cameras?
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 hours agoCan’t you get a surveillance camera from anywhere and use that?
AA5B@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
They’re pointing out that HomeKit cameras are specifically end to end encrypted and claimed inaccessible. Apple has really been pushing online privacy as a feature
You can get a camera from anywhere and either use it locally only or implement your own encryption before saving to a cloud resource if you can get one with any expectation of privacy. But you have to do all the work and it is never end to end encrypted
cecilkorik@piefed.ca 7 hours ago
Depends on your precise definition of the camera “end” I suppose, but an IP camera absolutely can be and should be end to end encrypted. Even if the camera itself does not support native encryption, at worst the aggregation point/server should. Really, surveillance cameras should be on their own dedicated private IP network anyway, ideally with physical isolation on any wired connections. Besides a physical, on-site attack (which is what the cameras are for!) there really should not be any plausible method of an outside attacker breaching into the non-encrypted part of the network at all.
And that’s the worst case, real-world scenario. Quite a few cameras do in fact support on-device encryption now so “never” is still definitely incorrect. You do have to do the work though. That’s how good security works, it doesn’t come in a box as much as many wish it would and even if it does it’s never one-size-fits-all.