Comment on Chatbots Make Terrible Doctors, New Study Finds
rumba@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
- can cut through bias is != unbiased. All it has to go on is training material, if you don’t put reddit in, you don’t get reddit’s bias.
- see #1
- The study is endoscopy only. results don’t say anything about other types or assistance like xrays where they’re markedly better. 4% on 19 doctors is error bar material. Let’s see more studies. Also, if they were really worse, fuck them for relying on AI, it should be there to have their back, not do their job. None of the uses for AI should be doing anything but assisting someone already doing the work.
- that’s one hell of a jump to conclusions from something that’s looking at endoscope pictures a doctor is taking while removing polyps to somehow doing the doctors job.
XLE@piefed.social 4 weeks ago
1/2: You still haven’t accounted for bias.
First and foremost: if you think you’ve solved the bias problem, please demonstrate it. This is your golden opportunity to shine where a multi-billion dollar tech companies have failed.
And no, “don’t use Reddit” isn’t sufficient.
3. You seem to be very selectively knowledgeable about AI, for example:
We know AI tricks people into thinking they’re more efficient when they’re less efficient.
Never mind AI psychosis.
4. We both know the medical field is for profit. It’s a wild leap to assume AI will magically not be, even if it fulfills all the other things you assumed up until this point.
rumba@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Apparently, reading comprehension isn’t your strong point. I’ll just block you now, no need to thank me.
XLE@piefed.social 4 weeks ago
Ironic. If only you had read a couple more sentences, you could have proven the naysayers wrong, and unleashed a never-before-seen unbiased AI on the world.