Comment

Comment on AI Didn't Break Copyright Law, It Just Exposed How Broken It Already Was

Tweet@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

If it was the day after they died, mightn’t that have an unintended consequence of making it more likely that copyright holders would start “falling out of windows” just when it’s convenient for producers and AI crooks to snaffle up their content, royalty-free?

source

Sort:hotnew top

Tehdastehdas@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Isn’t that how inheritance works?

source
- Tweet@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Well yeah, it is currently. But not if the work becomes PD when you die, as OP is suggesting.
  
  source
floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
… murder is also illegal?

source
- P1nkman@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Not for certain people.
  
  source
- Tweet@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  So you’re an author and the only thing between a billion dollar studio and a royalty-free production of your work (that you have no creative input into) is your own death. And you’d feel fine and safe with that because “murder is illegal”?
  
  It’s hard to get away unnoticed with producing a work that infringes copyright, since they tend to have to be released to the public, and from a known source. Getting away with murder is a cinch in comparison.
  
  source