Comment on The news is sugarcoating how revolting the Epstein files are

nednobbins@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

I’m willing to give the news some benefit of the doubt here because there actually are rational and non-evil reasons to do this.

Socially, we have at least two related, but distinct forms of sexual atrocity.

One is sex with children. There’s extensive evidence that sex before puberty leads to all kinds of long term negative effects for the victim.

The other is non-consent. No matter what the age of the people involved, non-consent has serious negative consequences for the victim.

The Epstein victims all seem to be extremely young post-adolescents. We generally wouldn’t care at all if they were getting it on with their high-school sweethearts.

The problem with the Epstein victims was primarily one of consent. There was a vast human trafficking network and many of our leaders were active participants. The whole thing was so horrible that normal people are sickened by it happening to anyone, not just children.

The reason we may want to be sticklers on this point is that this form of abuse is extremely common and really needs a spotlight on it. We don’t want people to come out the other end of this thing and think, “Sure pedophilia is bad but this guy is just pressuring his 18 year old secretary into sex and then making money passing her around to his buddies.”

source
Sort:hotnewtop