That’s the point, there has to be a human in the loop that sets explicit guard rails
The rules are in its code. It was not designed with ethics in mind, it was designed to steal IP, fool people into thinking it’s AI, and be profitable for its creators. They wrote the rules, and they do not care about right or wrong unless it impacts their bottom line.
ag10n@lemmy.world 3 days ago
SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
No, the point is the humans are there, but they’re the wrong kind of humans who make the wrong kind of guardrails.
ag10n@lemmy.world 3 days ago
It can’t, it’s software that needs a governing body to dictate the rules.
jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 days ago
The issue is more that there aren’t rules. Given there are billions of parameters that define how these models work, there isn’t really a way to ensure that it cant produce unwanted content.
bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Then they should be banned and made illegal. If one wants to run a LLM locally on their consumer machine then fine, can’t really stop someone from downloading something and they’re paying the electric bill.
But these things should not be running remotely on the internet.