Programmer time is more expensive than computer time.
That might excuse inefficiency if all of these things were true:
- The programmers were buying new computers for all their users
- The new computers were fast enough to keep slow software from wasting users’ time
- The electricity to run them was free
- The resources consumed and waste produced by that upgrade cycle had no impact on the environment
What’s really happening here is that producers of software are making things cheaper and easier for themselves by transferring and multiplying costs onto the users and the environment.
The amount of waste is staggering. It’s part of why I haven’t enjoyed professional software development in years.
InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s not the problem.
Software used to be an artisan job, a skilled engineer carefully sculpts a solution for a problem.
Management didn’t have much to add there, or visibility, this was a world-breaking problem for them.
The solution was issue-tracking, make every line of code a bureaucratic nightmare, ensure panopticon-like visibility for everything, that guaranteed the manager was always in control.
Progress slowed to a crawl, that’s fine, you just need to hire more developers, hundreds, they scale, right?
Good programmers stick to startups because large companies are just well-paying torture firms. I wouldn’t go back to Google for any amount of money, but I’ll do a startup almost for free, because they let me write code.
ono@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
I see you’ve met Jira. :)
InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 year ago
There are far worse things in the darkness than jira :( but yes.