then the 3 day sitewide bans end often leads to a shadow ban or sitewide ban, for unkown reasons for your part. as soon as they sniff other accounts you mave or deleted you are toast.
I’m probably applying too much logic here which Reddit admins don’t seem to like, but… how can defending oneself if something happens (not even preemptively, but after the fact) be threatening violence, while Trump is repeatedly saying they’re gonna own Greenland one way or another not threatening violence?
theres also other easy ways apparently to get banned too, “reporting people if the mods dont agree you can get permantly banned yourself”. or your comments are too spammy or to similar to bots.
SirHaxalot@nord.red 1 day ago
It was 3 day site wide bans as I understood it. Reason given was that saying that Greenland should defend itself was “threatening violence”.
The thread in question, thing it is in r/Sweden https://www.reddit.com/r/sweden/s/BvEiqSM2cf
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 19 hours ago
then the 3 day sitewide bans end often leads to a shadow ban or sitewide ban, for unkown reasons for your part. as soon as they sniff other accounts you mave or deleted you are toast.
WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I’m probably applying too much logic here which Reddit admins don’t seem to like, but… how can defending oneself if something happens (not even preemptively, but after the fact) be threatening violence, while Trump is repeatedly saying they’re gonna own Greenland one way or another not threatening violence?
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 19 hours ago
theres also other easy ways apparently to get banned too, “reporting people if the mods dont agree you can get permantly banned yourself”. or your comments are too spammy or to similar to bots.