Comment on

• Tollana1234567@lemmy.today ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  its also too easy to get banned. new accounts and old inactive accounts becoming suddenly active are highly likely to get banned.

  source
• cinoreus@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Ipo

  source

  • JamieDub86@piefed.social ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    That was the big one, but there was something else smaller last year.

    source

    • cinoreus@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      What?

      source
• SirHaxalot@nord.red ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I saw it in a post about people getting temp bans for simply stating that EU allies would be right to defend Greenland in case of military action. Might just have been one of several grievances with Reddit at the moment though

  source

  • WonderRin@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Woah, I haven’t heard about this. Are those temp bans on specific subreddits or a site-wide ban for not being pro-Trump?

    source

    • SirHaxalot@nord.red ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      It was 3 day site wide bans as I understood it. Reason given was that saying that Greenland should defend itself was “threatening violence”.

      The thread in question, thing it is in r/Sweden https://www.reddit.com/r/sweden/s/BvEiqSM2cf

      source

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        then the 3 day sitewide bans end often leads to a shadow ban or sitewide ban, for unkown reasons for your part. as soon as they sniff other accounts you mave or deleted you are toast.

        source
      • WonderRin@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        I’m probably applying too much logic here which Reddit admins don’t seem to like, but… how can defending oneself if something happens (not even preemptively, but after the fact) be threatening violence, while Trump is repeatedly saying they’re gonna own Greenland one way or another not threatening violence?

        source

        • -> View More Comments