Comment on Spotify is going to clone podcasters’ voices — and translate them to other languages
admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 year agoHa, tell me about out it. I’m pro-AI, but I’m also pro-artist. So I’m fine with people building all kinds of things using these tools, but I’m not fine with companies plundering every piece of content they can get their hands on, without permission of the creators. That is not really a popular opinion to have on here. Lucky for me though, I’m on a Lemmy instance that doesn’t allow downvotes. That does wonders for your state of mind :)
kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 year ago
It’s really strange, isn’t it? You’d think that fediverse users, out of anyone, would be more skeptical of companies trying to consolidate access to user-generated content, take ownership over it, and monetize it. I imagine most of us are Reddit refugees in some sense. Did we learn nothing?
admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 year ago
I think it mostly a matter of “most of the copyrighted material belongs to companies, fuck companies”, as well as a little bit of “I have nothing to
hidesteal”. And of course a fair dose of “magic box makes pretty pictures, don’t take it away”. But maybe I’m just cynical.kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 year ago
Yeah, that does seem to be the center of it.
I don’t know what to say to those people.
Cuz they’re not wrong. The practical effect of current IP law is to protect the business models of parasitic holding companies whose main role in producing art is to ensure that it is an effective financial instrument.
So from that perspective… Why would I respect Disney’s intellectual property rights?
But I recoil at the idea that this means we shouldn’t bestow any rights or protections to creative works. It seems to me that the biggest problem with IP rights is that creators are immediately bullied into signing over all of those rights to platforms/publishers/distributors.
And that immediate signing-over to mega corps… is exactly what is going on with OpenAI! But at massive scale!