It is. Capitalism requires a significantly capable system of violence to enforce physical property rights or capitalism can’t exist, violence is a foundation for capitalism. We don’t see it much because the legal system has been so effective we rarely encounter it, except for violent offenses, but laws and rules are backed by threat of force. Financial and business crimes are rarely prosecuted, so the violence of the law doesn’t get used much in that sphere. That privelege has been intentionally lobbied for over decades in an attempt to disempower the state from effectively governing business through it use of violence. But the person with the gun who can take your buildings and your machines and your data centers and your gold, ultimately determines who controls the things of value that wealth consists of. Capital requires violence used on its behalf to gain and maintain wealth. Violence is the basis of it all.
GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social 2 days ago
You mean you & others do not see it much.
minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Consolidating control of everything is the motive and goal, but the mechanism for it being possible is the use of force to maintain physical control of things, even in feudalism.
GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social 2 days ago
I agree, but you have sell it, to be able to do what you are talking about.
minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Violence is always needed for property rights, even outside feudalism and capitalism, though. Violence is a consistent presence across system types. Violence a a means to property control exists outside of civilization itself.