Comment on Meta's latest subscription move is an attempt to offset its AI bets
xcjs@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
Honestly, if this reduces user-hostile UI changes for paid accounts, and I can get a chronological feed of just friend activity with original content, I’d pay it at this point.
(I know there is supposed to be a friends-only feed now, but it’s not even close to being friends-only still.)
deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Seriously? You’re gonna pay money to this guy?
xcjs@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
I mean, do I want to give money to a billionaire? Not exactly.
On the other hand, if we don’t start supporting premium software services and open source projects, the enshtiffication trend will get worse.
I have to choose among my principles, and I’m strongly against user-hostile UI/UX paradigms, enshittification, and other downard quality trends in software/services.
deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
They’re actively doing enshittifying, though. How are they supposed to know what you’re rewarding them for?
xcjs@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
If it’s anything less than I want, I won’t be rewarding them at all.
xcjs@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
Replying to myself to follow-up.
Listen, I know it’s not a popular take, but software projects and services of any size require a sizable amount of effort and time - these projects are vulnerable to acquisition, abandonment, commercialization, and enshittification without support.
I’m on Facebook because of the network effect, and if there was a way to encourage it to become a better service, the pricing is reasonable, and if I get what I want - yeah, I’d pay it.
And I’m not speaking from lack of experience - I offered my own social media service for a time that offered privacy and extra storage for a price. Not one user paid, and I had to cancel the project after losing money. Good intentions alone get you nowhere.