Orienting the entire global economy for the niche use cases for AI of a very small number of people is a worthwhile freakout. We haven’t reached ‘freakout’ yet, but we should.
Comment on DuckDuckGo poll says 90% responders don't want AI
timestatic@feddit.org 2 days ago
Bro you guys are freaking out too much about AI. I mean a lot of companies are pushy about it but DuckDuckGo is not. There are actually quite a lot of use cases for me personally where AI can be really useful. DuckDuckGo is not Google or Microsoft. Chill out guys
Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 2 days ago
SkellyMonstera@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
This is def the main takeaway. We’ve been watching this AI craze unfold for years at this point with very little to show for it other than political weaponization, skyrocketing prices, and every piece of software we use being completely enshittified.
sly_lemmy@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
No one is freaking out. It’s use case might be valuable to some, that’s undeniable.
The problem is that it’s current implementation is abhorrent, unjustifiable for what it achieves and forced onto users that don’t even want it in the first place.
I know myself that a huge portion of users don’t want anything to do with AI. That they disagree with it for a number of very valid reasons. It’s not unreasonable to assume that different browser companies know this as well.
So why the fuck does not a single one of these shitlord browser companies AT LEAST release a version of their browser without any AI bundled in (regardless of it being on or off by default, like, be for real), let alone oppose it. We’re essentially begging at this point for someone to just…do nothing.
Doesn’t sound too difficult to me. But what do I know, I’m just a user of a browser.
sly_lemmy@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
Also, I said a ‘huge portion’ because I was generalising.
90%
90% of users want nothing to do with it.
And yet, here it is, whether they like it or not