Comment on New to NAS - What are the recommended solutions?

Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• cyberpunk007@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  But ZFS has a learning curve and limits easy backup options… but it’s worth it.

  source

  • rentar42@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I agree with the learning curve (personally I found it worthwhile, but that's subjective).

    But how does ZFS limit easy backup options? IMO it only adds options (like zfs send/receive) but any backup solution that works with any other file systems should work just as well with ZFS (potentially better since you can use snapshots to make sure any backup is internally consistent).

    source

    • cyberpunk007@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Because you can’t use typical back product software. If you do it the right way, you’re using my ZFS send and receive to another machine running ZFS which significantly adds to cost.

      source

      • rentar42@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        That's an extremely silly reason not to use a specific tool: Tool A provides an alternative way to do X, but I want to do X with some other tool B (that'll also work with tool A), so I won't be using tool A.

        Send/receive may or may not be the right answer for backing up even on ZFS, depending on what exactly you want to achieve. It's really nice when it is what you want, but it's no panacea (and certainly no reason to avoid ZFS, since its use it 100% optional).

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Eh… TrueNAS UI basically takes care of any zfs learning curve. The main thing I’d note is that RAID 5 & 6 can’t currently be expanded incrementally. So you either need to use mirroring, configure the system upfront to be as big as you expect you’ll need for years to come, or use smaller RAID 5 sets of disk (e.g. create 2 raid 5 volumes with 3 disks each instead of 1 RAID 5 volume with 6 disks).

    source