Comment

Comment on Help with understanding memory usage discrepancy

From what I can tell, my system isn’t currently using swap at all but it does have 8GB of available swap if needed.

To make sure I’m following what you are saying, if I upgraded my system to 64GB and changed nothing else, and let’s assume ZFS didn’t trying caching more stuff, would there still be a potential for my system to use swap just because the system wanted to even if it wasn’t memory constrained?

source

Sort:hotnew top

eager_eagle@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
yes, the system will likely use some swap if available even when there’s plenty of free RAM left:

The casual reader1 may think that with a sufficient amount of memory, swap is unnecessary but this brings us to the second reason. A significant number of the pages referenced by a process early in its life may only be used for initialisation and then never used again. It is better to swap out those pages and create more disk buffers than leave them resident and unused.

Src: www.kernel.org/doc/gorman/…/understand014.html

In my recently booted system with 32GB and half of that free (not even “available”), I can already see 10s of MB of swap used.

As rule of thumb, it’s only a concern or indication that the system is/was starved of memory if a significant share of swap is in use. But even then, it might just be some cached pages hanging around because the kernel decided to keep instead of evicting them.

source
- a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  TIL. Thanks for the information
  
  source