Comment on Bluesky just verified ICE
rglullis@communick.news 1 day agoLabeling the account as verified and excluding/not excluding from the AppView are two separate actions.
Comment on Bluesky just verified ICE
rglullis@communick.news 1 day agoLabeling the account as verified and excluding/not excluding from the AppView are two separate actions.
balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
It is a clear indication that they don’t intend to ban the account, they have verified it on their own server. They are two separate actions, but one implies that the other will not be done.
And in any case, I’m pointing out that the dichotomy between “verify ICE and let them post propaganda officially” and “let ICE post propaganda with plausible deniability” is false, they can (should) just ban them.
rglullis@communick.news 1 day ago
This is false.
balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Do you expect bsky to ban ICE? They already have a job posting to join the Gestapo in their profile, do you think that’s not enough of a reason to ban them?
rglullis@communick.news 1 day ago
I don’t know how else to say it: you keep falling into the same non-sequitur.
No, I don’t expect them to ban anyone from the government. And, no, I don’t think it would be wise to do it: verifying the account does not mean they are supporting it, it just means they are making sure that whatever crap ICE is saying can not go around without accountability.
If you don’t want to see their shitty posts, now you can simply filter it out. And thanks to verification, you can share your filters to others. That’s how decentralized systems work. Bluesky does not control who I get to see. ICE or any other institution can not buy its way into manufacturing propaganda.