Comment on BentoPDF v1.16.0
Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m running it and it screams vibe coded. The maintainer worked for an AI company before this as well, so it wouldn’t surprise me if it is mostly AI written. It’s buggy and clunky, despitr having a clean UI. The features are random and incomplete. The PDF Form creator is a joke. The signature portion doesn’t work. The “simple” mode really should be default. The website has big company bames in it saying “used by peoplr working at” which is just a bullshit and unimportant thing to say to put big companies logos on the site. Also those same logos aren’t currently removed from the simple mode probably because the AI didn’t consider that when it added the feature.
I know it’s a new project, so I am hoping it gets better. I have wanted a tool exactly like this for so long. Unfortunate that it’s a result of AI, but beggars can’t be choosers
alam@lemmy.world 1 day ago
A few clarifications first, because there are some incorrect assumptions here. BentoPDF is not AI written. BentoPDF was built manually over months of active development, with continuous refactoring, and iteration and community contributions. In my previous role, I worked on building AI systems to solve specific problems, and it doesn’t have any direct relation to Bento. Reducing the work of contributors to that is frankly unfair.
That said, it is a fast moving open source project, and not every feature is finished or polished to the same degree. You see, the bad part about building a software is that bugs are inevitable, even billion dollar companies have it, and I am but a solo dev.
So Bugs and rough edges are expected at this stage, and actionable bug reports are genuinely useful there. So, If you’ve run into specific breakages, opening issues with details, or just telling what’s wrong and what can be improved, is the most effective way to improve things. Broad label like AI written don’t really help move the project forward, especially given the amount of real work behind it.
But I do appreciate that you want a tool like this to exist and improve. Also, as regards to the Used By People Section, it was already fixed, along with a FOUC issue in simple mode, but it’s in our
edgerelease, which I have mentioned in the very top of our release note. Thanks