Comment on New Social Web Working Group at W3C
rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 days agoThat’s because AP as it is implemented today is crap, it’s a superficial compatibility layer on top of a proprietary (as in, doing non-standardized stuff) platform. We need to take it on its head and make AP the actual core then build on top
julian@activitypub.space 2 days ago
What is this proprietary layer you speak of?
rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 days ago
The mastodon api, or the lemmy api, or the xyz api. Eagh platform has its own. Being public doesn’t make it standard, hence the “proprietary” qualifier
julian@activitypub.space 2 days ago
Oh I see. Yes, AP first apps would be great, but getting older apps connected via AP is important too.
NodeBB predates ActivityPub (or came around the same time), and so we added it recently. It works quite well with our existing code. Not much of a compatibility layer.