Comment on "Not A Single Pixel" Of The New Ecco Game Will Be Generated By AI, Insists Series Creator
Grimy@lemmy.world 2 days agoI do include ethics in my decisions. My ethics simply aren’t dictated by copyright juggernauts.
Comment on "Not A Single Pixel" Of The New Ecco Game Will Be Generated By AI, Insists Series Creator
Grimy@lemmy.world 2 days agoI do include ethics in my decisions. My ethics simply aren’t dictated by copyright juggernauts.
frongt@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
So all the individual artists who had their work scraped are juggernauts?
Grimy@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No DeviantArt, Shutterstock, instagram and company are the juggernauts. Artists already gave it all away.
There isn’t a scenario where individual artists get a piece of that money. Legislation, if it comes, will protect data aggregators, record companies and Hollywood, with the aim of killing open source.
Google paid 60$ million for Reddit’s data and I still haven’t received my dollar. Google would also love it if training a model costs so much only they could afford to build one.
frongt@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
So it’s okay to steal their work for AI and commercial profit because they posted it on the internet?
Grimy@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I’m saying they stopped owning it the moment they put it on the big websites and signed away their work by clicking the box at the end of the ToS.
I see two choices:
Scrapping isn’t considered theft and we all get easy access to these new tools.
It’s considered theft and the new tools end up behind censored subscription models while shutter stock makes a shit load of money.
Paying every artists what they are worth is a logistical nightmare because of the amount of data needed. It simply won’t happen and isn’t a realistic scenario. It sucks but sticking your head in the sand and giving a soft monopoly to google and openai doesn’t help anyone but google and openai.