Alphabetical order
A problem since a lot just choose the first or last.
There’s not really much here that isn’t pretty easily solved. Alphabetical order, descriptions yes, written by each vendor. Yes Firefox would be required to be listed since it’s one of the handful not based on chromium. Design literally is just solving these exact kinds of problems and it happens every day, no need to make it a harder problem than it is.
theterrasque@infosec.pub 1 year ago
mojo@lemm.ee 1 year ago
It is a hard problem, for all the reasons I listed lol. Alphabetical order would be a terrible idea, browsers would be punished because of their name. Randomized order would be better. Obviously Firefox would be there, that doesn’t even need to be stated. This isn’t easily solved, and we do not have browser neutrality or anything close to it in any form or platform.
These are things you need to figure out, there’s no “no need to make it harder problem than it is” when it comes to designing these very important things. That’s just how you have straight up bad design that isn’t thought out.
SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 year ago
As someone who struggles with decision paralysis all the time, you obviously get that but much worse.
And yes you are 100% making this harder than it is.
“This is how you get bad design”
Ok and your way is how we get complete inaction
And009@reddthat.com 1 year ago
If they really wanna provide options they can.
TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I can’t wait to start using Aardvark browser.