Comment on And now Bezos is trying to inserts ads everywhere

art@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• clonedhuman@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Yes! I’m right there with you.

  source
• Ganbat@lemmyonline.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Okay, but where do you stand on indie artists that are using Patreon to act like major studios, e.g. nothing is free and their work is limited release and deleted after the month?

  source

  • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I find it harder to be upset about what an artist does with their work because they’re the sole creator and didn’t exploit anyone to make it. The limited release stuff doesn’t sound great but none of the artists I follow do that, I certainly wouldn’t support them if they did. If they’re planning to never release the art ever again then I think there’s a fair argument to be made for piracy, although if you’re just waiting for the month to turn over to look at it guilt free, well, I think you’re just trying to justify it to yourself.

    source

    • Ganbat@lemmy.fmhy.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I’ve seen a few that delete their stuff after the month and never release it again. IIRC, at least one of them was making relatively huge cash per month and only ever released cropped previews publicly, so that one was definitely what I’d call predatory, but that is just the most extreme case I’ve seen. I hate that false scarcity works so well.

      source
  • art@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I’ve never seen an indie artist on Patreon that delete shit or used any kind of DRM. At least no artist that I’ve been inspired to support.

    I try to never steal from people, only corporations.

    source

    • Ganbat@lemmyonline.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I’ve seen a few different methods. Scrubbed Patreon profiles, archives with passwords that change every month and aren’t redistributed, etc. I’ve run into several artists who do this.

      source