Comment on ‘Just an unbelievable amount of pollution’: how big a threat is AI to the climate?
frongt@lemmy.zip 3 weeks agoI’d rather just not build them
Comment on ‘Just an unbelievable amount of pollution’: how big a threat is AI to the climate?
frongt@lemmy.zip 3 weeks agoI’d rather just not build them
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Is Coal and Gas is your preferred energy source? Because that’s what nuclear would be replacing.
morto@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Nuclear investments will probably just meet the increase in energy consumption due to new datacenters, not make an energy transition
frongt@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
The datacenters.
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’d rather it didn’t rain today, but it did and I still needed to bring an umbrella no matter how much I didn’t like the rain.
kalkulat@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
That expenditure would displace the 10x the power which renewables + storage have already proven to do all over the world… that’s what nuclear would replace. Nuclear is never good news.
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
There are no other alternatives for baseline power generation.
You can’t run a national grid on 100% renewables and batteries. If you’re not using nuclear then you’re using fossil and fossil fuels are not only polluting but the dependence on them creates a huge amount of political instability around the world.
Nuclear plants use less uranium than Coal plants burn into the atmosphere. Coal has trace amount of radioactive uranium and if you burn hundreds of thousands of tons of it every year then you’re putting pounds of radioactive uranium into the atmosphere.
kalkulat@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago