Comment on Rainbow Six Siege Has Been Hacked Again, And Players Are Reportedly Getting 67-Day Bans

• essell@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Can you clarify, are they focused on Linux or ignoring it?

  source

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I’m assuming this is a good faith question and that you’re not just just trying to play word games: they’re focused on scapegoating Linux by refusing to support it and blaming it for supposedly being a security nightmare. I’m pointing out that this is misplaced obviously because they have bigger concerns, as evidenced by the article.

    source

    • essell@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I was confused by your metaphor so was genuinely trying to clarify!

      I couldn’t work out if you thought they’re wasting resources on Linux or should be investing in Linux

      source

      • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        I see! My metaphor was mainly meant to illustrate that whether anticheat is directly related to the current security issue is orthogonal to why I thought it was relevant to bring up. I could have picked a better one that didn’t imply that their misplaced concern about Linux cheaters actually consumes resources.

        Maybe a better metaphor would be a municipality refusing to do something about a small issue (maybe poor transit to a specific neighborhood) and also actively refusing to let that neighborhood solve the problem themselves (proton devs) with the excuse that allowing that neighborhood to have transit would cost too much (even if the neighborhood were to do it themselves) and cause more crime (painting Linux users as hackers) all the while some completely unrelated group is actually causing the crime elsewhere.

        source