Comment on Transcribed text of Samantha Fulnecky's assignment, paper, and professor's comments

• 3abas@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Grade: F (0/100) Your submission does not meet the basic expectations for an academic reflection or critique. Rather than engaging the article’s claims with evidence, you substitute personal belief as an argument and treat disagreement as a rebuttal. That is not analysis; it is opinion.

  You were explicitly expected to challenge the material using empirical findings, methodological critique, or testable alternative hypotheses. You did none of those. There are no credible sources used to support your counterclaims, no operational definitions, no evaluation of the study’s design, and no attempt to distinguish “I feel” from “the evidence shows.” The result reads as a refusal to participate in scholarly inquiry.

  Until you can separate personal convictions from evidentiary argument, and demonstrate that separation in writing, you will continue to fail assignments of this type.

  source