You are so close to getting it.
Define “criminals.”
Comment on US tech enabled China’s surveillance empire. Now Tibetan refugees in Nepal are paying the price
Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 2 days ago
You need surveillance. How are you going to catch criminals? It is a crucial piece of evidence.
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
This is how people justify surveillance states.
What you actually get is “accountability for thee, none for me”, because people with power get to turn the cameras off whenever they want.
Just look at !Epsteinfiles@lemmy.world to see how easy for people with money and power to [REDACTED].
We don’t need (state) surveillance (on citizens).
We need (citizen) surveillance (on the the state).