Also the normal and rpi versions are completely independent implementations of the same software. So now the LLMs have twice the maintenance load.
I didn’t diff the two files but the startup and control code appears to be custom for each version.
Comment on Here is a more polished release of nanogram. Fully compatible on raspberry pi now.
6nk06@sh.itjust.works 2 days agoAnd it’s worse because they hide the Python code, which means that they can’t use tools like uv or ruff to check that everything works properly. I don’t understand why people do this.
Also the normal and rpi versions are completely independent implementations of the same software. So now the LLMs have twice the maintenance load.
I didn’t diff the two files but the startup and control code appears to be custom for each version.
Better? gitlab.com/here_forawhile/nanogram-termux
Dedicated expanded pi version coming later.
They are different environments, and so there are many changes that take place in order for it to work on a PI.
The core app and features are a mirror.
What do you mean lol?
CameronDev@programming.dev 2 days ago
Charitably: AI turbocharged dunning-kruger
Less charitable: Malware delivery.
There is no good reason why they couldn’t have a normal source tree, that they pack into a single shell script in CI.
hereforawhile@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Here is the source tree.
Image
CameronDev@programming.dev 1 day ago
Sorry, but a photo of a directory structure is not a source tree.
Your git repo consists of 4 files, a readme, a licence, and two packed shell scripts.
If you have an actual published source repo, link people to it.
hereforawhile@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
So just a expanded file structure directory is what you want? The script executable expands to each individual piece once run.
What do you mean a actual published source repo? I do not understand how its not that. Everything is packaged into one script.