Essentially, the NFT is “proof of ownership” only insofar as what is put into the blockchain is correct and accurately reflects reality. If you don’t validate, the blockchain is useless, and if you do validate, you don’t need a blockchain, you can just use a traditional database.
Syrc@lemmy.world 1 year ago
So it’s a matter of being relatively easy to scam people with it? Is it an issue only when the NFT is “made” for the first time or for every transaction too?
I personally thought the appeal was that you can sell them as regular items, whereas if they were in a traditional database you still would’ve needed the transaction to be approved by the database itself.
At least that’s what I figured, I know nothing of how selling an NFT works so I could be just talking out of my ass.
LexiMax@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
That is merely a side-effect of one of the original sins of programmable blockchains - the fact that there is a delegation of responsibility of data management from a database administrator to whoever happens to have control of that data, and the controller can only manage that data according to the underlying code of the NFT.
This only sounds appealing if you’ve never actually touched a database in your life. Making everybody their own database administrator is a terrible idea, and the only reason blockchains do it that way is because there’s no other sane way to write applications on a distributed, globally mutable database.