Comment on Anti-Trans Groups Want a Bathroom Ban. Judges Aren’t Giving Them One
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 13 hours agoIncreasing throughput and reducing cleaning time are both good things, though.
Increased throughput means less queuing and being able to quickly relieve yourself. In a shared toilet, this would benefit men and women alike.
Making cleaning quicker and easier means it’ll happen more and be less disruptive when it does happen.
Denjin@feddit.uk 13 hours ago
But if you want to make true ungendered toilets (as was suggested) that are accessible to all, having a section where a bunch of guys all basically get their cocks out and piss in a trough kinda prevents that.
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 6 hours ago
Sometimes gendered stuff makes sense - like urinals. As you mentioned they’re efficient and I’d imagine a large part of why the gents toilets don’t have big queues. I’m all for trans folk using whatever toilet they want, I’m more worried about the folk who are presumably checking everyone’s genitals to make sure they’re in the correct toilet.
Apocalypteroid@feddit.uk 11 hours ago
Just have one room full of urinals, one room full of stalls, both ungendered. So then anyone can use any facility they feel most comfortable with.