Comment on I Went All-In on AI. The MIT Study Is Right.

<- View Parent
dsilverz@calckey.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

@Jayjader@jlai.lu @technology@lemmy.world

Given how it's very akin to dynamic and chaotic systems (e.g. double pendulum, whose initial position, mass and length rules the movement of the pendulum, very similar to how the initial seed and input rule the output of generative AIs) due to the insurmountable amount of physically intertwined factors and the possibility of generalizing the system in mathematical, differential terms, I'd say that the more fit would be a physicist. Or a mathematician. lol

As always, relevant xkcd:
https://xkcd.com/435/

source
Sort:hotnewtop